<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now serving: Blogher Bouillabaisse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.julieleung.com/archives/1976/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.julieleung.com/archives/1976</link>
	<description>pictures and stories from the water's edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.julieleung.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1#comment-2151</link>
		<dc:creator>jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julieleung.com/wordpress/?p=1976#comment-2151</guid>
		<description>Wow Julie.. that took some time. What a robust resource... You are so good at painting big pictures:)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Julie.. that took some time. What a robust resource&#8230; You are so good at painting big pictures:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://www.julieleung.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1#comment-2150</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 04:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julieleung.com/wordpress/?p=1976#comment-2150</guid>
		<description>WOW. What a wonderful recap of the BlogHer experience. Well worth waiting for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. What a wonderful recap of the BlogHer experience. Well worth waiting for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ponzi</title>
		<link>http://www.julieleung.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1#comment-2149</link>
		<dc:creator>Ponzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 06:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julieleung.com/wordpress/?p=1976#comment-2149</guid>
		<description>You are eloquent as always, wonderful post - your are an inspiration. I had a wonderful time with you and your whole crew at dinner - and beyond! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are eloquent as always, wonderful post &#8211; your are an inspiration. I had a wonderful time with you and your whole crew at dinner &#8211; and beyond! <img src='http://www.julieleung.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.julieleung.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1#comment-2148</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julieleung.com/wordpress/?p=1976#comment-2148</guid>
		<description>WOW - Thanks to everyone for reading through my lengthy summary! I hope the community and conversation continue!

Amy - I just went through and corrected the url I had been using for your blog to contentious.com. Sorry about that error.

Jay - thanks for pointing out the two different proofs. I&#039;ve been thinking about that...

Sour Duck- I just corrected the link to Scoble to
http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/08/11.html#a10829
Sorry for the mistake!

Jenn - I&#039;m glad your blog is back!

Thanks again to Jory and Elisa (and Lisa)!

Thanks too to paul, Koan, Ronni, Nancy, Beth and Beth.

As Lisa Williams has said, Blogher doesn&#039;t have to end, it just has to move! Let&#039;s keep the party and discussions going...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW &#8211; Thanks to everyone for reading through my lengthy summary! I hope the community and conversation continue!</p>
<p>Amy &#8211; I just went through and corrected the url I had been using for your blog to contentious.com. Sorry about that error.</p>
<p>Jay &#8211; thanks for pointing out the two different proofs. I&#8217;ve been thinking about that&#8230;</p>
<p>Sour Duck- I just corrected the link to Scoble to<br />
<a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/08/11.html#a10829" rel="nofollow">http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/08/11.html#a10829</a><br />
Sorry for the mistake!</p>
<p>Jenn &#8211; I&#8217;m glad your blog is back!</p>
<p>Thanks again to Jory and Elisa (and Lisa)!</p>
<p>Thanks too to paul, Koan, Ronni, Nancy, Beth and Beth.</p>
<p>As Lisa Williams has said, Blogher doesn&#8217;t have to end, it just has to move! Let&#8217;s keep the party and discussions going&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sour Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.julieleung.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1#comment-2147</link>
		<dc:creator>Sour Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 03:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julieleung.com/wordpress/?p=1976#comment-2147</guid>
		<description>Hi Julie - Nice post, and thanks for the nod in the beginning, it&#039;s nice to receive that kind of validation from people about my Blogher round-up posts. ;) Cheers.

Re: The link attached to the text &quot;Scoble noted in Fast Company&quot; appears to repeat the previous link to jennifer.com; I&#039;d be interested to see the Scoble article you refer to - can you correct it or give the url here in the comments? Thanks. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Julie &#8211; Nice post, and thanks for the nod in the beginning, it&#8217;s nice to receive that kind of validation from people about my Blogher round-up posts. <img src='http://www.julieleung.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Cheers.</p>
<p>Re: The link attached to the text &#8220;Scoble noted in Fast Company&#8221; appears to repeat the previous link to jennifer.com; I&#8217;d be interested to see the Scoble article you refer to &#8211; can you correct it or give the url here in the comments? Thanks. <img src='http://www.julieleung.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.julieleung.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julieleung.com/wordpress/?p=1976#comment-2146</guid>
		<description>Julie - great job synthesizing the BlogHer conference - I almost feel like I was there (no, not really).  I hope I can attend next year, it sounds like it was quite an experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie &#8211; great job synthesizing the BlogHer conference &#8211; I almost feel like I was there (no, not really).  I hope I can attend next year, it sounds like it was quite an experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Rosen</title>
		<link>http://www.julieleung.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1#comment-2145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julieleung.com/wordpress/?p=1976#comment-2145</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your post, Julie.  You did a great job.  It&#039;s like the formula for succeeding with a small-town newspaper: mention a lot of names!  

I would like to point out that this..

&quot;Blogging is only perpetuating current power structures. It&#039;s true. Perhaps we can change it. Perhaps we do need to reveal the lack of neutrality.&quot;

... contains two different ideas.  Lack of neutrality, as you put it, or &quot;it&#039;s not a meritocracy!&quot; (as others have said) is one.  Perpetuating current power structures (or meet the  new boss, some as the old) is another.  They actually require separate proofs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your post, Julie.  You did a great job.  It&#8217;s like the formula for succeeding with a small-town newspaper: mention a lot of names!  </p>
<p>I would like to point out that this..</p>
<p>&#8220;Blogging is only perpetuating current power structures. It&#8217;s true. Perhaps we can change it. Perhaps we do need to reveal the lack of neutrality.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230; contains two different ideas.  Lack of neutrality, as you put it, or &#8220;it&#8217;s not a meritocracy!&#8221; (as others have said) is one.  Perpetuating current power structures (or meet the  new boss, some as the old) is another.  They actually require separate proofs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.julieleung.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julieleung.com/wordpress/?p=1976#comment-2144</guid>
		<description>Fantastic job of describing the conference - in both  in action and reflection.  I enjoyed every word!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic job of describing the conference &#8211; in both  in action and reflection.  I enjoyed every word!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy White</title>
		<link>http://www.julieleung.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1#comment-2143</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julieleung.com/wordpress/?p=1976#comment-2143</guid>
		<description>Ditto to almost ALL of the above (I&#039;d say to Jay, blogging is part of life of a mother, islander, etc., no?) and WOW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto to almost ALL of the above (I&#8217;d say to Jay, blogging is part of life of a mother, islander, etc., no?) and WOW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Warwick</title>
		<link>http://www.julieleung.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1#comment-2142</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Warwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julieleung.com/wordpress/?p=1976#comment-2142</guid>
		<description>Julie!

What an incredible job you&#039;ve done synthesizing everything.  This is so very helpful, as I continue to untangle my notes and all I learned.

Thanks, too, for the generous links.  I am so new at this that Susan Kitchens had to tell me I was on Scoble (!) I missed it completely.  It always gives me goosebumps to think someone read what I wrote.  I hope it never stops...

Again, thank you for the hours of labor that clearly went into this post.  What a gift to the rest of us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie!</p>
<p>What an incredible job you&#8217;ve done synthesizing everything.  This is so very helpful, as I continue to untangle my notes and all I learned.</p>
<p>Thanks, too, for the generous links.  I am so new at this that Susan Kitchens had to tell me I was on Scoble (!) I missed it completely.  It always gives me goosebumps to think someone read what I wrote.  I hope it never stops&#8230;</p>
<p>Again, thank you for the hours of labor that clearly went into this post.  What a gift to the rest of us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

